[sv-bc] virtual interface mantis items

From: Francoise Martinolle <fm@cadence.com>
Date: Thu May 26 2011 - 10:46:07 PDT

Have we given up on discussing the issues with virtual interfaces?
We have spent a few meetings brainstorming about it, we have gone in circles
and not concluded anything. Customers use virtual interfaces and interfaces today.
I would really like to pick this back up in the next meeting, because we have outstanding issues
described in mantis items 2848 and 2845 that contradict the virtual interface type definition compatibility.

If at all, since this version of the standard is supposed to resolve ambiguities and issues in the LRM
we should be putting restrictions on what an interface connected to a virtual interface
can contain as a measure of safety.

Mehdi, I would really like to put this for discussion on the agenda for next meeting.

Francoise
       '

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu May 26 10:46:26 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 26 2011 - 10:46:49 PDT