[sv-bc] RE: 3398 and 3625

Francoise,

In the past, I have interpreted "or preserve no state information" as being a real "or", i.e., "shall either be automatic or otherwise preserve no state information", and not an additional restriction. That is, a static function that preserves no state information would be legal.

Are there automatic functions that preserve state information?

Also see Mantis 2928.

This change would affect both assertions and constraints.

Regards,
Shalom

From: owner-sv-dc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 3:29 AM
To: sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-dc] 3398 and 3625

I have updated 3398 with the latest versio of the proposal for nettypes. I have deleted all previous
versions.
I also have submitted a new mantis item 3625 for the BC to consider to change
Functions shall be automatic (or preserve no state information) and have no side effects.

to:
Functions shall be automatic, preserve no state information and have no side effects.
I wil lmake a proposal to for 3625 and ask BC to add it to the agenda of next meeting.

Francoise
       '

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.