The LRM states the intent:
The always_ff procedure can be used to model synthesizable sequential logic behavior
Your question seems to imply that you want to deviate from this or exploit a loophole for your interests.
What is the motivation for the question?
Matt
-- Matt Maidment mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Korchemny, Dmitry Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 4:20 AM To: 'sv-bc (sv-bc@eda.org)' Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org Subject: [sv-ac] Time consuming tasks in always_ff Hi all, In 9.2.2.4 it is written that "The always_ff procedure imposes the restriction that it contains one and only one event control and no blocking timing controls." However, it is not written explicitly that there cannot be calls to task with such event controls. How should I interpret this statement? Thanks, Dmitry --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jul 19 08:20:14 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 19 2011 - 08:20:22 PDT