[sv-bc] RE: Agenda: Aug 1 SV-BC Meeting

Hi, Matt.

In the Outstanding Action Items, the first few appear twice:

> Outstanding
> 05/10/10 Matt create Master Issue for WG-approved SV-BC Top-25
> 07/19/10 Jonathan post some items for discussion related to 2114 to
> reflector.
> 08/02/10 Brad give SV-BC feedback on Mantis 2992 to Mehdi
> 08/02/10 Eric start reflector thread on Mantis 2310
> 08/16/20 All send Shalom feedback about prioritizing the issues raised
> in port declaration issue summary:
> http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/10498.html
> 09/13/10 Jonathan show simple examples of virtual interfaces, sub-
> interfaces
> and base classes in modules to demonstrate different methods for
> connecting design and testbenches.
> 09/27/10 Review Shalom's list of interface issues and suggest issues to
> tackle now.
> 05/10/10 Matt create Master Issue for WG-approved SV-BC Top-25
> 07/19/10 Jonathan post some items for discussion related to 2114 to
> reflector.
> 08/02/10 Brad give SV-BC feedback on Mantis 2992 to Mehdi
> 08/02/10 Eric start reflector thread on Mantis 2310
> 08/16/20 All send Shalom feedback about prioritizing the issues raised
> in port declaration issue summary:
> http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/10498.html
> 09/13/10 Jonathan show simple examples of virtual interfaces, sub-
> interfaces
> and base classes in modules to demonstrate different methods for
> connecting design and testbenches.
> 09/27/10 Review Shalom's list of interface issues and suggest issues to
> tackle now.

The following was done as Mantis 3607.

> 12/06/10 Matt open new Mantis item covering determination of port kind
> for .named_port connection (23.2.2.3).

The following was done as Mantis 3681.

> 07/18/11 Gord to file an SV-CC issue to add a clarification that
> vpiLocalParam should be true for cases where parameter declared
> but
> it is a synonym for localparam as noted in 2289 and 3326.
 
The following should probably be done by adding a note to Mantis 1974.

> 07/18/11 File new mantis item to clarify determination of true/false for
> If-statement (12.4), while, do-while, iff, conditional operator
> and potentially others for all data types.

On the following, see my recent mail. I don't see any need for a clarification.

> 07/18/11 File new mantis item to request clarification of Short-circuiting
> of &&, ||, ->, ?: (11.3.5)

Regards,
Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.