Can the impoverished attribute syntax of Syntax 5-3 really carry the weight?
Why not use/extend the `pragma directive of Syntax 22-8?
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich@mentor.com> wrote:
> Why does this proposal continue to promote the use comment pragmas
> instead of attributes? I thought the use of attributes is to be encouraged
> because you can’t construct macros to deal with comments. Or are we giving
> up on attributes?****
>
> ** **
>
> Dave Rich
> Verification Technologist
> Mentor Graphics Corporation
>
> **
>
> *[image: Description: Twitter-32]* <http://www.twitter.com/dave_59>* **[image:
> Description: Technorati-32]* <http://go.mentor.com/drich>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 02 2011 - 12:22:14 PDT