Hi,I have returned to working on port declarations, particularly on integrating interface port declarations (i.e., port that is an interface, not a port of an interface), hoping we can approve something before the October 1 deadline, though I am in doubt whether I will be able to attend the September 12 meeting.Anyway, Mantis 1619, which added default values to input net ports in ANSI style declarations changed the BNF fromansi_port_declaration ::= [ net_port_header | interface_port_header ] port_identifier { unpacked_dimension } | …toansi_port_declaration ::= [ net_port_header | interface_port_header ] port_identifier { unpacked_dimension } [ = constant_expression ] | …The addition of the [= constant_expression] is appropriate for net_port_header, but does not seem so for interface_port_header. I think we should split them into two, like this:ansi_port_declaration ::= [ net_port_header ] port_identifier { unpacked_dimension } [ = constant_expression ]| [ interface_port_header ] port_identifier { unpacked_dimension }| …Any comments?Thanks,ShalomShalom BrestickerIntel LAD DA, Jerusalem, Israel+972 2 589 6582 (office)+972 54 721 1033 (cell)---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 22 2011 - 13:38:08 PDT