[sv-bc] RE: Errata: Clarify comments in streaming concatenation as an assignment target example

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
Date: Sun Sep 04 2011 - 07:08:11 PDT

See http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/10444.html

Shalom

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Coffin, Eric
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 12:22 AM
To: SV-BC
Subject: [sv-bc] Errata: Clarify comments in streaming concatenation as an assignment target example

The example in section 11.4.14.3, "Streaming concatenation as an assignment target (unpack)", provides an example with the text:

{>>{a,b,c}} = 96'b1; // OK: unpack a = 0, b = 0, c = 1
{>>{a, b, c}} = 100'b1; // OK: unpack as above (4 bits unread)

This causes confusion. When the second line's comment mentions 'as above' does that mean that a, b and c all have the same values as the line immediately above it which contains 96'b1? Or does that mean that this line is valid, and that it is unpacked in a manner given by the text starting on page 221?

The first interpretation implies that the value of c is 1, while the second interpretation implies that the value of c is 0.

-Eric

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sun Sep 4 07:08:47 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 04 2011 - 07:09:00 PDT