Hi,
In the current LRM, the sentence that says for integral operands, "the first and second expressions are extended to the same width" is not dependent on the value of cond_predicate. As you have reformulated it, that sentence applies only when cond_predicate is ambiguous and the expressions are not logically equivalent.
Also, by adding "For integral expressions," then the phrase "unless either the first or second expression is real, in which case the result shall be 0," should be deleted.
Regards,
Shalom
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Rich, Dave
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 9:47 AM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] Mantis 1523 conditional operator with arrays
New proposal based on feedback from Aug 29th meeting uploaded.
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1523
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Sep 12 05:41:51 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 12 2011 - 05:42:04 PDT