RE: [sv-bc] Re: Moving mantis items to the resolved state

Looks good to me.

Thanks!

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Bromley
> Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 12:53 PM
> To: Maidment, Matthew R
> Cc: neil.korpusik@oracle.com; sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] Re: Moving mantis items to the resolved state
>
> Matt, Neil,
>
> Apologies for the delay - I just missed your previous mail before going
> quiet for the weekend.
>
> I've uploaded a new proposal for 1067 in both source and PDF form. I
> hope it does what's needed.
>
> cheers
> Jonathan Bromley
>
> On 09/10/2011 07:31, Maidment, Matthew R wrote:
> > Hi Neil.
> >
> > I'm waiting on Jonathan Bromley in order to wrap up 1067. We approved it
> with friendly amendments.
> > Need the proposal source in order to put it in a proper state for
> Champions to review.
> >
> > Matt
> > --
> > Matt Maidment
> > mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Neil Korpusik [mailto:neil.korpusik@oracle.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 4:40 PM
> >> To: Little Scott-B11206; Korchemny, Dmitry; Maidment, Matthew R; Charlie
> >> Dawson; Mehdi Mohtashemi
> >> Cc: Brad Pierce; Thomas Thatcher; Ghassan Khoory; Rich, Dave; Karen
> Pieper
> >> Subject: Moving mantis items to the resolved state
> >>
> >> FYI,
> >>
> >> The following mantis items are currently up for a champions email vote.
> >> Please make sure that all of the mantis items that have been approved by
> >> your technical committee are placed into the resolved state. This is how
> I
> >> know what is ready for the Champions.
> >>
> >> 1356 SV-EC Multiple inheritance
> >> 2081 SV-BC Not clear enough which kinds of statements are prohibited
> >> in
> >> always_comb
> >> 2547 SV-AC local variable read before write
> >> 3015 SV-AC Examples of $fatal have bad arguments
> >> 3202 SV-AC Clarify on whether certain system functions are allowed
> in
> >> classes, 'let', and other corner cases
> >> 3213 SV-AC Update definition of sampled value
> >> 3326 SV-BC LRM in BNF allows parameters declaration under generate,
> >> while
> >> in generate chapter it is forbidden
> >> 2289 SV-BC 6.20.1 should say that generate block and compilation
> unit-
> >> scope
> >> parameters are local
> >> 2093 SV-AC Checker construct should permit output arguments
> >>
> >> I know that a few additional mantis items were approved this week. There
> >> may be others from previous weeks that have been approved but not moved
> to
> >> the resolved state. Now is the time to take care of this.
> >>
> >> The technical committees have until this Saturday to complete their work
> on
> >> new proposals. After that, the committees are only allowed to work on
> >> feedback from the Champions. The only exception to this is for the sv-cc
> >> which has an additional 2 weeks to finish any work that is required due
> to
> >> activity within another committee.
> >>
> >> There isn't much time left, so I suggest that any work required due to
> >> Champion's feedback get done right away. The schedule calls for
> everything
> > >from the technical committees and the Champions to be done by October
> 27th.
> >> The Champions will need some time to review any updates from the
> technical
> >> committees.
> >>
> >>
> >> Neil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.