[sv-bc] List of participants - please review/respond by Jan 12 2012

Hi All.

Per the note below, Neil has requested a list of
participants and their affiliations for this round of the standard.
Based on attendance over the course of
this PAR (http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/minutes/sv-bc_11_11_21.txt)
and Neil's criteria, Brad and I recommend these names:

Steven Sharp - Cadence
Francoise Martinolle - Cadence
Matt Maidment - Intel
Tom Alsop - Intel
Shalom Bresticker - Intel
Dave Rich - Mentor Graphics
Gordon Vreugdenhil - Mentor Graphics
Alex Gran - Mentor Graphics
Arnab Saha - Mentor Graphics
Eric Coffin - Mentor Graphics
Brad Pierce - Synopsys
Mark Hartoog - Synopsys
Peter Flake - Accellera
Daniel Schostak - ARM
Kaiming Ho - Fraunhofer Institute

For those of you on the list, please verify your name spelling and affiliation
and respond with any corrections no later than January 12, 2012.

If you are not on the list and believe you should be, please contact Brad and I.

Thanks,

Matt

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Neil Korpusik
>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 4:30 PM
>Subject: List of participants
>
>Hi Technical Chairs and Co-chairs,
>
>It is time to determine the list of names that will be shown in the front
>of the SystemVerilog LRM. These are shown in the "Participants" section.
>See
>pages v through vii of draft 4 for the lists that were in 1800-2009. These
>lists have not been updated since 1800-2009 was published.
>
>The Working Group has decided that it should be up to the TC chairs and
>co-chairs to determine the list of names for their respective committees.
>This time around we are attempting to get the list of names finalized
>before balloting begins.
>
>The following guidance should be used when determining who should be on
>the list.
>
> - This list represents those individuals that participated in the
> development of 1800-2012. The starting point for determining who has
> participated is Jun 24, 2010.
> - The list should contain the names of those individuals that attended
> a certain percentage of meetings (at least 1/3rd was suggested).
> - Those that have made major contributions, even if they were only
> involved for a portion of the time. An example of this would be
>someone
> that was only active for a few months, but did a lot of work on
>various
> proposals during that period of time.
> - The company names for those people listed should be verified.
> We want to ensure we give the correct affiliation.
>
>
>We would like to get this information to the Editor at the end of this
>week.
>
>
>Neil
>
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.