I don't think that your description of current implementations is true. The tools I work with will flag e = 1; // e is an enum as a syntax error, and I don't know of switches to turn that off. Shalom > Personally, at this point, I think that we'd end up with a more > consistent definition if we just tossed any remaining assumptions about > "strong" enums and do what (almost?) all implementations already either > do by default or support as an option -- just treat enums as normal > integral values with no special typing rules. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Mar 22 11:35:44 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 22 2014 - 11:35:52 PDT