The syntax of the design statement in configurations is: design_statement ::= design { [ library_identifier . ] cell_identifier } ; Since curly brackets are used, a syntactically legal statement would be 'design ;'. Was their ever any intent to allow this? Or are the curly brackets only intended to allow multiple specifications in a design statement? Thanks, Shalom Shalom Bresticker Communications & Storage Infrastructure Group Design Automation Intel Jerusalem, Israel +972 2 589 6582 (office) +972 54 721 1033 (cell) http://www.linkedin.com/in/shalombresticker The devil is in the details. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Oct 13 05:23:14 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 13 2014 - 05:23:31 PDT