Before brining any particular mantis issues to the table, I would like to have a better focus on the type of work needed for the next PAR. As many of you are well aware, there are many implementation differences from what the LRM specifies that are very confusing for the user community. I would like to see people bring these issues forward and addressed in the next PAR. Dave -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 5:56 AM To: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org Subject: [sv-ec] RE: Scoping Next 1800 Effort - Due EO February Hi Shalom, Because of the overlap in membership of SV-BC and SV-EC, the plan is to have joint calls to assemble the input for the Working Group. -- Brad -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Feb 7 09:43:43 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Feb 07 2015 - 09:44:03 PST