[sv-bc] RE: Scoping Next 1800 Effort - Due EO February

I've received feedback in support of:

0000678 Variables shall be allowed for slicing vectors.
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=678

0002969 allow data member references in in-line random variable control (18.11)
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2969

I've also received mention of the follow topics (I've found some Mantis items that might apply):

- new native wait flavor that accepts functions in the expression
- Ability for inline constraints to optionally stick - enable inline constraints to take effect when variable re-randomized
- Extend packages from other files: http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2962
- Nested Packages: http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4798
- Query an object as to whether a random variable has been randomized
- Query an object (typically from post_randomize) whether an inline constraint was used to randomize a particular variable
- Bind issues with libraries: http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4753
- Enum extension: http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2991 & scoping: http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2992
- Improve the preprocessor: http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1202
- Introspection: http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2994


--
Matt Maidment
mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad
>Pierce
>Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 6:38 PM
>To: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
>Subject: [sv-bc] RE: Scoping Next 1800 Effort - Due EO February
>
>Hi Matt,
>
>If SV-BC and SV-EC re-open, I would suggest
>
>   Interop with IEEE Std 1735-2014 (encryption)
>
>              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=5015
>
>   NBA to static variable across 'ref static' function port
>
>              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2583
>              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4607
>
>   Dynamic indexing of arrayed instances
>
>              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4764
>              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4763
>
>-- Brad
>
>[In reply to http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/11665.html and
>http://www.eda.org/sv-ec/hm/8539.html .]
>
>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>
>


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.