RE: [sv-bc] name resolution of struct members

True Steve. We could decide if we want the same rules to apply to structs.
The only problem is that we don't have a correct detailed specification to
discuss and decide.

At 04:11 PM 4/9/2004 -0400, Steven Sharp wrote:
>While I can file an erratum, I wouldn't expect it to be resolved any
>time soon. Meanwhile, the tools will continue to work the way they
>always have, regardless of the LRM text. I would suggest that the
>rules for struct members not wait for the rules for hierarchical
>references. If it is desired that they should depend on those rules
>somehow, then that should just be stated.
>
>Steven Sharp
>sharp@cadence.com
Received on Fri Apr 9 13:56:53 2004