RE: [sv-bc] Errata: Glossary typo

Hi All,

As this Errata is very simple (a typo), I move that we accept this and
have it fixed in the LRM. We don't have a meeting next Monday and we
have a deadline to send the feedback to David Smith by 4/19, therefore I
wanted to check if anyone "objects" to this correction. If not, David
shall include it in the LRM version.

--- Johny.

>>> Message from Dave Risch <<<

[sv-bc] Errata: Glossary typo

* This message: [ Message body
<http://www.eda.org/vlog-pp/sv-bc/hm/1694.html#start#start> ] [ More
options
<http://www.eda.org/vlog-pp/sv-bc/hm/1694.html#options2#options2> ]
* Related messages: [ Next message
<http://www.eda.org/vlog-pp/sv-bc/hm/1695.html> ] [ Previous message
<http://www.eda.org/vlog-pp/sv-bc/hm/1693.html> ]

From: Dave Rich <David.Rich@synopsys.com
<mailto:David.Rich@synopsys.com?Subject=Re:%20%5bsv-bc%5d%20Errata:%20Gl
ossary%20typo> >
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 22:42:46 PDT

In the glossary's Bit-stream definition

Replace

A bit-stream type or variables any type

With

A bit-stream type or variable*_ i_*s any type

 
Received on Thu Apr 15 10:08:49 2004