Based on the discussion of the thread at
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/1772.html, I propose the following erratum
to take care of both signed and unsigned enum values.
Add after the sentence in section 3.10 "A name without a value is
automatically assigned an increment of the value of the previous name."
the following sentence:
"It shall be an error if the incrementing the previous value causes an
overflow within the significant digits of the enumerated type."
-- -- David.Rich@Synopsys.com Technical Marketing Consultant and/or Principal Product Engineer http://www.SystemVerilog.org tele: 650-584-4026 cell: 510-589-2625Received on Mon Jun 14 22:51:23 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 14 2004 - 22:51:32 PDT