RE: [sv-bc] Comments on SV-BC 254 Aggregate expressions -> constructors

Dave,

I updated the proposal to take into account the concerns you raised.
This version tries to be very explicit about what does and does not
constitute an assignment-like context, which is to say, where the
type prefix on an aggregrate constructor can or cannot be omitted.

> Maybe we could think of a third way to phrase this which is better than
both?
>
>-- Brad

-- Brad
Received on Mon Oct 11 09:04:16 2004