RE: [sv-bc] question about net declarations in packages

I think the former is syntactically legal, but the latter in not.

I would be in favor of a semantic restriction that prohibits both of
these because they create a process. If we allow wire w = f(i); then we
should also allow continuous assigns and always blocks.

Dave

________________________________

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 9:39 AM
To: 'Sv-Bc'
Subject: [sv-bc] question about net declarations in packages

I would like a confirmation that we allow all variations of net
declaration syntax in packages.

For ex:

This is allowed

package p;

  integer i;

  wire w = i;

endpackage

but this is not:

package p;

  integer i;

  wire w;

  assign w = i;

endpackage

 
Received on Fri Oct 29 10:05:42 2004