Hello all,
I spoke to Matt Maidment on Friday about how picky we should be
in suggesting LRM changes. He would like for us to be very thorough
and picky. So, for example, we should note the places where the LRM
says "variable" and should really say something more general.
We agreed that on Thursday, I will forward three documents to the
SV-BC, SV-CC, SV-EC, and SV-AC chairs (who can then distribute them
to their groups). They are:
- A user-friendly overview of the datatypes on nets extension
- A set of LRM changes that are important for defining this extension
- A set of less critical changes that would make the LRM more accurate
and consistent.
Matt suggested the following proposal as a good model:
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000254
> It's one of Brad Pierce's issues. Scroll down to 'Attached Files'
> and have a look at the proposal in aggregate_constructors6.htm .
Kathy
Received on Tue Nov 9 09:00:41 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 09 2004 - 09:00:44 PST