Re: [sv-bc] Deadline for detailed feedback on Data Types on Nets Proposal

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon Nov 15 2004 - 13:49:15 PST

I tend to agree that 'reg' should not be a data type and that it
would be better to use 'reg' instead of 'var'.

Could someone please remind us again of the arguments for keeping
'reg' as a data type that is equivalent to 'logic'?

-- Brad
Received on Mon Nov 15 13:49:18 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark Hartoog: "RE: [sv-bc] Deadline for detailed feedback on Data Types on Nets Proposal"
Previous message: Maidment, Matthew R: "[sv-bc] Minutes: Nov 15 SV-BC CC: net data type proposal review"
In reply to: Paul Graham: "Re: [sv-bc] Deadline for detailed feedback on Data Types on Nets Proposal"
Next in thread: Mark Hartoog: "RE: [sv-bc] Deadline for detailed feedback on Data Types on Nets Proposal"
Reply: Mark Hartoog: "RE: [sv-bc] Deadline for detailed feedback on Data Types on Nets Proposal"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 15 2004 - 13:49:31 PST