>The SV-CC has pointed out ( http://www.eda.org/sv-cc/hm/2179.html )
>that the current proposal is silent on DPI and VPI
There were a few proposed changes to the relevant sections, which the
subgroup decided to send to the SV-CC rather than the SV-BC, so they
didn't appear in the SV-BC proposal. Since Francoise Martinolle
found the issues, we may have assumed that she would give them to the
SV-CC.
In addition to those text changes, some changes to the VPI diagrams
are also needed. I believe Steve Dovich was going to try to do
something with that.
Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Wed Nov 17 19:28:33 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 17 2004 - 19:29:07 PST