Re: [sv-bc] RE: Friendly amendment wording for 109

Forgive my ignorance about what is being talked about, but I don't have web
access now.

I an a bit concerned about this, as I occasionally seen designs that do this
deliberately.

Is the intent that the message be compile-time or run-time?

Thanks,
Shalom

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Neil Korpusik wrote:

> Hi Francoise,
>
> The word "shall" is most appropriate.
>
> Automatic truncation from a larger number of bits to a smaller
> number of bits shall cause a warning to be issued.

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary