RE: [sv-bc] New Mantis item 321 (easy one)

Uploaded SV-321-1.htm with the suggested change.

-Doug

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:34 AM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] New Mantis item 321 (easy one)
>
> That text would make more sense to the user if the comment in
> the example were extended to say something like "unless explicitly
> declared static".
>
> -- Brad
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org]On Behalf Of
> Warmke, Doug
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:40 AM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] New Mantis item 321 (easy one)
>
>
> Hello SV-BC,
>
> I've added new Mantis item 321
>
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000321
>
> In Section 5.5, the following appears:
>
> program automatic test ;
> int i; // not within a procedural block - static
> task foo( int a ); // arguments and variables in foo are automatic
> ...
> endtask
> endmodule
>
> The "endmodule" should be "endprogram".
>
> In addition, it should be explicitly spelled out
> that it is permissible to make hierarchical references
> to any static object, even those residing inside
> automatic tasks and functions.
>
> A proposal has been uploaded.
>
> Regards,
> Doug
>
>
Received on Wed Nov 24 13:18:13 2004