RE: [sv-bc] Updated proposal for `keywords compatibility directive

Shalom,

Two of the amendments to the `keywords proposal that were approved yesterday
were:

1) Add uwire to the 1364-2005 and 1800-2005 keyword lists. This was based
on the fact that the 1364-ETF approved the uwire proposal the day before. I
agree that if the 1800 working group does not give final approval to the
uwire proposal, then the `keywords proposal will need to have the uwire
keyword removed. This should be noted in the recommendations the Champions
make to the 1800 committee. I will bring this up at the Champions meeting.

2) I was to add an example that specifically addressed your request of using
an 1800 keyword as a 1364 identifier. I did add this example to the final
proposal, but perhaps missed the mark for what you wanted. The added
example uses "logic" as an identifier, but took the negative approach of
showing that this would result in an error with a `keywords "1800-2005"
directive. If this example does not meet your request, then I would
consider that I did not make the amendment correctly per what was approved
by the BC committee vote. I can modify the amendment to meet those
requirements. Please be specific on what needs to be changed in the
examples to meet your request. Perhaps the paragraph describing the example
I added just needs a sentence stating that the error can be corrected by
specifying `keywords "1364-1995", `keywords "1364-2001" or `keywords
"11364-2005".

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: shalom@eagle.msil.sps.mot.com
> [mailto:shalom@eagle.msil.sps.mot.com] On Behalf Of
> Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:59 PM
> To: Stuart Sutherland
> Cc: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Updated proposal for `keywords
> compatibility directive
>
> Note:
>
> The proposal assumes that the uwire keyword will enter 1364-2005.
> It it does not, then uwire needs to be deleted from the 1364-2005 and
> 1800-2005 lists.
>
>
> I still think that the most typical, useful, and instructive
> example is missing: using a `keywords "1364-2005" directive
> to allow the use of 1800 keywords within older code.
>
> Shalom
>
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Stuart Sutherland wrote:
>
> >
> > I have made the amendments to the proposal for SV errata 328, on
> > adding a `keywords compatibility directive, per the
> decisions approved
> > in today's SV-BC meeting.
> >
> > The amended proposal is attached. I do not know the procedure for
> > uploading this to the errata data base, so someone will
> have to do this for me.
> >
> > Stu
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Stuart Sutherland
> > stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
> > +1-503-692-0898
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker
> @freescale.com
> Design & Verification Methodology Tel:
> +972 9 9522268
> Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax:
> +972 9 9522890
> POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell:
> +972 50 5441478
>
> [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential
> Proprietary
>
>
>
Received on Wed Dec 1 09:12:45 2004