[sv-bc] issue with unions

From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
Date: Tue Dec 07 2004 - 18:28:49 PST

I have filed a new issue 336, related to problematic types that are
apparently allowed in unions. Perhaps someone out there knows what
the intent was, or perhaps I have missed something in the LRM.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Tue Dec 7 18:28:55 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Rich, Dave: "RE: [sv-bc] issue with unions"
Previous message: Greg Jaxon: "Re: [sv-bc] Ambiguity with packed struct literals"
Next in thread: Rich, Dave: "RE: [sv-bc] issue with unions"
Maybe reply: Rich, Dave: "RE: [sv-bc] issue with unions"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 07 2004 - 18:29:18 PST