Re: [sv-bc] FWD: URGENT: please review updated proposal for keyword compatibility (SV issue 328)

1. I prefer the compiler directive version. I see no advantage to defining
`keywords as a pragma instead of a compiler directive. The only difference
is that as a pragma, the user has more typing to do.

2. I dislike the requirement that `endkeywords must be specified.
I would want the ability to just say `keywords xxxx at the beginning
and have that apply to everything till the end, without having to add
an additional file at the end just for adding an `endkeywords.

3. I'm sorry that this proposal has swelled up like this.
I think the original proposal was compact, clean, and elegant.

Shalom

On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Maidment, Matthew R wrote:

> Forward from Stu. I've uploaded the proposals in the SVDB
>
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000328
>
> See Attached files:
>
> P1800_keyword_compatibility_directive_proposal.pdf
> P1800_keyword_compatibility_pragma_proposal.pdf

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary