I noticed that the proposal for 275 looks identical to the proposal for 334.
I think that the intention indicated by Mehdi in the bugnotes of 275 was to
close 334, 197, 203 and 271 and put the total proposal for the string
changes into 275. I
don't think that the data base reflects the final status of these errata.
A few minor friendly amendments to the current proposal of 275:
275:
In the changes in paragraph 3.7. a space is missing space between period and
"Reading":
string.Reading an element of a string yields a byte.
CHANGE : if the second argument to putc is zero, the string is unaffected:
if c is zero, then str is unchanged.
TO:
if the second argument to putc is the value 0, the string is unaffected: if
c is the value 0, then str is unchanged.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-champions@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org] On
Behalf Of Karen Pieper
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 9:48 PM
To: sv-champions@eda.org; ieee1800@eda.org
Cc: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org; sv-ac@eda.org; sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-champions] Champions meeting 1/4/05
Hi, all,
We need to have the Champions meeting 1/4/05 at 9am for 1 hour. We need to
discuss issues:
50, 275, 314, 334, 197, 203, 271
I haven't heard back about the Encryption proposal, but have asked Tom and
Steven for an update.
If any of you know of any other proposals we need to consider, please reply
so I can update the list further.
Thanks,
Karen
Received on Mon Jan 3 10:03:44 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 03 2005 - 10:04:37 PST