[sv-bc] Issue #315

From: Mark Hartoog <Mark.Hartoog@synopsys.com>
Date: Tue Jan 25 2005 - 11:24:00 PST

I was suppose to review issue 315 changes as well.

I notice that in the bind syntax box in section 17.15 the
bind_instantiation rule is missing the interface_instantiation.
The interface_instantiation is part of the bind_instantiation
rule in Appendix A and it was in the syntax box in 3.1a too.
The #315 erratum did not call for this to be deleted.

There is some other text that has been deleted and is marked in
red, but was not part of issue #315. From the draft 3 LRM I can
not see what other item caused this text to be deleted. The
LRM makes it look like it was #315. Examples of this are:

1) The sentence:
"A program block contains non-design code (either
testbench or properties) and executes in the Reactive region,
as explained in Section 16.",

2) The two items in the list after the example:
-- Ports (a, b,c) get bound to signals (a,b,c) of module cpu.
-- Every instance of cpu gets the properties

3) The second example:
Example of binding a program instance to a specific instance of a module:

         bind cpu1 fpu_props fpu_rules_1(a,b,c);

 

Mark Hartoog
700 E. Middlefield Road
Mountain View, CA 94043
650 584-5404
markh@synopsys.com
Received on Tue Jan 25 11:24:13 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 25 2005 - 11:24:22 PST