Hi Nikhil,
Is your suggestion because of a syntax collision/ambiguity with aggregate
constructors?
Surrendra
At 03:39 PM 2/1/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>Brad,
>
>I think there is a another (small) consequence of your '{} proposal.
>
>In "8.4.1 Pattern Matching", we have defined structure patterns using
>ordinary braces (the existing syntax for structure literals). To be
>consistent with your new proposal, I would change that to also require
>the tick in front of the braces.
>
>It would require fixes to the syntax in Syntax 8-4 (and Annex
>A.6.7.1), and fixes to the various examples in 8.4.1.
>
>I think these are small fixes.
>
>Do you agree?
>
>Nikhil
**********************************************
Surrendra A. Dudani
Synopsys, Inc.
377 Simarano Drive, Suite 300
Marlboro, MA 01752
Tel: 508-263-8072
Fax: 508-263-8123
email: Surrendra.Dudani@synopsys.com
**********************************************
Received on Wed Feb 2 07:25:49 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 07:27:16 PST