While reviewing aspects of the draft SV standard, we came across the following in Section 11.4.3 (Default argument values [Tasks and Functions]): The default_value is an expression. The expression is evaluated in the scope of the caller each time the subroutine is called. The elements of the expression must be visible at the scope of subroutine and, if used, at the scope of the caller. If the default_value is not used, the expression is not evaluated and need not be visible at the scope of the caller. The LRM requires that the terms of the default expression to be resolved in the context of the **caller**. This is not at all reasonable as a general programming language semantic definition, nor in the context of separate compilation and hierarchically referenced tasks and functions. Consider obvious examples such as: module A; parameter p1 = 1; function integer f(integer x = p1) ...... endmodule module B; real p1; A a(); initial $display(a.f); endmodule The LRM currently requires that actual parameter value used in the call of a.f will be the value of "p1" from B.p1. Although in the context of synthesis, one could conceivably make an argument that this "macro" view of default values might be useful (since hierarchical calls aren't allowed), in the context of simulation, this is not reasonable. This issue will be raised as part of Mentor's official response, but I wanted to raise this immediately since we consider this to be a very significant flaw. Gord -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil, Staff Engineer 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.comReceived on Thu Mar 3 08:48:34 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:48:41 PST