RE: [sv-bc] Re: Fwd: Re: Priority / Unique Errors

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Arturo
> Salz
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 4:47 AM
> To: Steven Sharp; sv-bc@eda.org; cliffc@sunburst-design.com
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Re: Fwd: Re: Priority / Unique Errors
> 
> Also note that unlike
> user-written
> assertions in which the user code could actually deal with some of
these
> situations
> in a case by case basis, the priority/unique warnings are built into
the
> tool, thus
> giving users no access to such mechanisms.
> 
[DR>] That is why I tried to propose that the default branch of a
priority/unique case statement not be part of the check, and only get
executed if there is a violation. Having a default branch in a p/u case
statement is currently useless.

I would rather we take some functionality out than let poorly understood
functionality go in. Spend the proper amount of time to get it right.

Dave