[sv-bc] re: scheduling problem comment

From: <Shalom.Bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Mon Apr 11 2005 - 19:55:18 PDT
But the proposals define pretty exactly what the intent 
of the wording needs to be. Until now, there was not
agreement that there is a problem, and if so, how to 
solve it. Only after passing that stage is exact
wording important. I don't think lack of exact wording
is justification for not discussing a comment.

If there will be agreement on the problem and the
solution, then someone will be able to work on the wording.

There will hundreds of comments.
Only a minute number proposed exact wording.

Shalom


On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Maidment, Matthew R wrote:

> Exactly.  This missing wording is the reason we have
> yet to even attempt to agree on anything.  It seems
> that without pinning anyone into details the discussion
> drifts to FUD and winds up scaring off any motivation
> to change it.
> 
> Matt 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: shalom@fil.ea.freescale.net 
> >[mailto:shalom@fil.ea.freescale.net] On Behalf Of 
> >Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
> >Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 8:43 AM
> >To: Maidment, Matthew R
> >Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Agenda: April 11 SV-BC Ballot Resolution 
> >Committee CC
> >
> >There were TWO proposals!
> >
> >What was missing was specific wording.
> >
> >Shalom
> >
> >
> >On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Maidment, Matthew R wrote:
> >
> >> I will bring it up.  I didn't see a proposal.  So far
> >> we've had no success spec'ing an alternative to the 
> >> present situation and an actual proposal would might
> >> improve its chances of acceptance.
> >> 
> >> Matt 
> >> 
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: shalom@az33smr01.freescale.net 
> >> >[mailto:shalom@az33smr01.freescale.net] On Behalf Of Shalom 
> >Bresticker
> >> >Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 2:14 AM
> >> >To: Maidment, Matthew R
> >> >Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Agenda: April 11 SV-BC Ballot Resolution 
> >> >Committee CC
> >> >
> >> >Matt,
> >> >
> >> >What about the initializer/cont. assignment/etc. scheduling 
> >> >issue, brought up by
> >> >Stu Sutherland and me?
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Shalom
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Maidment, Matthew R" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> SV-BC Ballot Resolution Committee Meeting
> >> >> Date: Monday, April 11th
> >> >> Time: 09:00am-11:00am PDT
> >> >>
> >> >> Toll Free Dial In Number: (888)635-9997
> >> >> International Access/Caller Paid Dial In Number: (763)315-6815
> >> >> PARTICIPANT CODE: 53904
> >> >>
> >> >> Agenda
> >> >>
> >> >> +Review IEEE patent policy
> >> >>   http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt
> >> >>
> >> >> +Review Previous Meeting Minutes
> >> >>   http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/minutes/sv-bc_05_04_06.txt
> >> >>
> >> >> +Issue Resolution
> >> >>
> >> >> High Negative:
> >> >>  202/627
> >> >>  244
> >> >>  229 (from SV-EC)
> >> >> Negative, No Priority
> >> >>  264
> >> >>  265
> >> >>  266
> >> >> High Positive
> >> >>   35
> >> >>    6
> >> >>   21
> >> >>   29
> >> >>   91
> >> >>   93
> >> >>  216
> >> >>  224
> >> >>  273
> >> >>  275
> >> >>  278
> >> >>  285
> >> >> Positive, No Priority
> >> >>  225
> >> >>  226
> >> >>  227
> >> >>  228
> >> >> Low Negative
> >> >>  257
> >> >> Low Positive
> >> >>  152
> >> >>  154
> >> >>  155
> >> >>  156
> >> >>  286
> >> >>  287
> >> >>
> >> >> Action Items
> >> >>
> >> >> Completed
> >> >> 04/04/05 Matt notify SV-EC about proposal for 244
> >> >>
> >> >> Pending
> >> >> 04/01/05 Karen Ask Johny for the purpose of the 'WG 
> >> >Resolution' column
> >> >> 04/01/05 Steven will review and propose solution for 
> >issue 6 at the
> >> >>          April 4 meeting.
> >> >> 04/01/05 Karen to provide Gord with SVDB account
> >> >> 04/01/05 Brad to assign issue 29 to Gord
> >> >> 04/01/05 Brad to propose solution to issue 91 at the April 
> >> >4th meeting
> >> >> 04/01/05 Dave to propose solution to issue 216 at the April 
> >> >4th meeting
> >> >> 04/01/05 Brad enter issue 269 into SVDB
> >> >> 04/04/05 Karen ask submitter of issue 202 to provide example
> >> >> demonstrating how
> >> >>          reordering bind statements produces different results.
> >> >> 04/04/05 Cliff make proposal for issue 264 for April 6
> >> >> 04/04/05 Stu make a specific proposal for Issue 265 no later 
> >> >than April
> >> >> 13
> >> >> 04/04/05 Brad to update proposal for issue 226 for April 6
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Matt Maidment
> >> >> mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com                     Tel: +972 
> >> >9  9522268
> >> >Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 
> >> >9  9522890
> >> >POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972
> >> >50 5441478
> >> >
> >> >[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential 
> >> >Proprietary
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> 
> >
> >-- 
> >Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com                     Tel: +972 
> >9  9522268
> >Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 
> >9  9522890
> >POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 
> >50 5441478
> >  
> >[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential 
> >Proprietary
> >
> >
> 

-- 
Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com                     Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary
Received on Mon Apr 11 19:55:35 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 11 2005 - 19:56:47 PDT