>Please pardon me for dropping in in the middle of the discussion, but >I couldn't help overhearing the sentence: > > "...So the simpler solution is to just forbid declaring a static > task in this case, which is the direction we want users to take > anyway..." > >I hope we are not talking about forbidding static tasks in all cases, >as we will then eliminate a very useful and long standing feature of >the Verilog language. I hope so also. I think that when Dave said "in this case", he meant "if you want to use a ref argument". The proposal is not to forbid static tasks, but to forbid declaring ref arguments in static tasks. It is more restrictive than is necessary to deal with the problem. However, I can go along with it under the argument that it is easier to relax restrictions later than to add them. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Tue Apr 12 12:24:54 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:24:58 PDT