Steven Sharp wrote: >>Dennis Brophy wrote: >> >> >>>Maybe instead of config-endconfig we could have beginconfig-endconfig. >>>That might reduce the name collisions. >>> >>> >>Brad Pierce replied: >> >> >>>How about 'configuration', as in VHDL? >>> >>> > >I have determined that neither "beginconfig" nor "configuration" appear >as identifiers in our customer design suite. > > Hmm...is a change of keywords even something we should put on the table? The good: It preserves the flow and intent of the 2001 configurations while providing a better keyword environment for legacy ()pre-2001) designs. The bad: All vendors and all users of configurations have to make a change. Is it worth a quick straw poll to guage the receptiveness to this kind of thing? I'd especially appreciate hearing from users of configurations. In the interest of getting over what's become a massive hump and achieving consensus, I'd be willing to vote in the affirmative for a keyword change. I'm a little worried about the keyword, "configuration", since I know we have had customers run into this conflict and they must have changed it to something (and "configuration" is a likely candidate!). Other than that, I don't have strong opinions about which keyword. -randy.Received on Thu Apr 28 16:44:59 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 28 2005 - 16:45:29 PDT