RE: [sv-bc] @* vs. always_comb

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Tue Dec 13 2005 - 14:27:51 PST
>From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>

>Side point: "expansion" is not formally described. 6.7 says,
>"See 8.11 for the definition of the expansion of a longest static
>prefix". Actually, while 8.11 defines a longest static prefix (in a way
>which is difficult to understand), it does not define what is the
>expansion of such a prefix.

Which means that, as I said, the behavior is not well defined in the LRM.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Tue Dec 13 14:27:56 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 13 2005 - 14:28:27 PST