> This is a backward incompatible change. Can you provide the technical > justification for this? I'm not saying there is no justification; just > that it needs to be explained for us to move on it. So far I have heard > nothing other than editorial comments. Sure. It will be easier to implement. Implementors can get their job done faster. Tools will come to market sooner. Designers will spend less time scratching their heads over these rules and can start using SV sooner. While this change is not backwards compatible with the existing P1800 lrm, I bet that very few real designs use the non-parenthesized function call feature, so removal of this feature should not have much negative impact. PaulReceived on Wed Dec 14 11:07:24 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 14 2005 - 11:08:10 PST