Re: [sv-bc] Function call without parenthesis

Neither of these are even legal syntax, because "trial" is a type
identifier.  If you want usages like that, we'd need to start allowing
the :: operator on types, as suggested in

  http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/3310.html

and recorded in

  http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=948

-- Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Greg
Jaxon
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:28 AM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Function call without parenthesis

More to the point would be this example:

    typedef enum {
       original=0,
       first=1,
       second,
       third,
       penultimate,
       last,
       out_of_bounds
    } trial;

Is trial.first  equal to 0 or 1?  How about trial.first()?

Greg Jaxon