This seems like an arbitrary, new restriction, not a bug fix. Why shouldn't foreach be used to iterate over the bits of a vector instead of using a macro like the following? `define FOREACH(A,I) \ for (int I = $left(A) \ ; I != $right(A)-$increment(A) \ ; I += -$increment(A) \ ) -- Brad -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Steven Sharp Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:51 PM To: sv-ec@eda.org; Dave_Rich@mentor.com Subject: Re: [sv-ec] foreach iterates over unpacked arrays >From: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com> >The LRM does not explicitly say the foreach statement iterates of unpacked arrays and not packed arrays. The wording suggests that, but could be made stronger. Mantis 1306 added with proposal. And is there some technical reason why a foreach statement shouldn't be allowed to iterate over packed dimensions? Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Tue Jan 17 14:14:25 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 17 2006 - 14:15:13 PST