[sv-bc] RE: Mantis 1255

Regarding Mantis 1255, while I largely agree with Doug, I think it is
still not clear whether UDPs have ports or terminals. Both terms are
used.

Shalom


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Warmke, Doug
> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 8:15 AM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] A few Mantis issues
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> I created and uploaded proposals for two more easy issues:
> 
>    http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001260
>    http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001261
> 
> We can review these and vote on them next meeting.
> 
> ***
> 
> On issue
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001255,
> next meeting I would like to move that we close the issue as
> already addressed in Clause 11.6.6 of 1364-2005_D7:
> 
>    "Primitive terminals are different from module ports.
> Primitive
> output and inout terminals shall be connected
> directly to 1-bit nets or 1-bit structural net expressions (see
> 12.3.9.2), with no intervening process that could
> alter the strength. Changes from primitive evaluations are
> scheduled as
> active update events on the
> connected nets. Input terminals connected to 1-bit nets or 1-
> bit
> structural net expressions are also connected
> directly, with no intervening process that could affect the
> strength.
> Input terminals connected to other kinds
> of expressions are represented as implicit continuous
> assignments from
> the expression to an implicit net that
> is connected to the input terminal."
> 
> This is newly added text, which appears to adequately address
> Shalom's concerns in Mantis #1255.  Additionally, I text-
> searched
> the PDF LRM for "terminal", and found all uses were consistent
> with:
> 
>  - primitive terminals
>  - specify block terminals
>  - terminals given to timing check system tasks
> 
> ***
> 
> Matt, can you please add these three items to next meeting's
> agenda,
> along with the other items with proposal from my earlier mail
> that
> stemmed from our last meeting?
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Doug