RE: [sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Tue Jan 31 2006 - 04:43:33 PST

I repeat: 1299 is not relevant. It has no connection to 1072 and 1298,
which deal with bit-extension. If you look at the original minutes, you
will find that the other issue which was to be dealt with was Mantis
1004.

Shalom


> The bulk of 1298 was copied into 1072.
> Only a small offshoot item was copied into 1299.

Received on Tue Jan 31 04:43:56 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bresticker, Shalom: "RE: [sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th"
Previous message: Bresticker, Shalom: "RE: [sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th"
Maybe in reply to: Maidment, Matthew R: "[sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th"
Next in thread: Bresticker, Shalom: "RE: [sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 31 2006 - 04:45:09 PST