RE: [sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th

Shalom,

The idea was to nullify 1298, since it is redundant with other items.
The action in the minutes was to transfer the discussion of 1298 into
one of the other items, so that it would be preserved.  I chose 1072.

Now, I added Bug Notes to both 1298 as well as 1004, referencing them
to each other.

We can close 1298 at the next meeting, as a redundant item.

Regards,
Doug 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 4:44 AM
> To: Warmke, Doug; sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th
> 
> I repeat: 1299 is not relevant. It has no connection to 1072 and 1298,
> which deal with bit-extension. If you look at the original 
> minutes, you
> will find that the other issue which was to be dealt with was Mantis
> 1004.
> 
> Shalom
> 
> 
> > The bulk of 1298 was copied into 1072.
> > Only a small offshoot item was copied into 1299.
>