Re: [sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th

>SVDB  871 _X_Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=871
>
>SVDB  881 _X_Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=881
>
>SVDB  882 _X_Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=882
>
>SVDB  908 _X_Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=908
>
>SVDB  911 _X_Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=911

Though it would read better if "it is not be" were replaced with "it is not"
instead of "it not be".

>SVDB  912 _X_Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=912
>
>SVDB  919 _X_Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=919
>
>SVDB  932 _X_Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=932
>
>SVDB  941 _X_Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=941
>
>SVDB  942 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=942
>
>SVDB  944 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=944
>
>SVDB  945 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=945
>
>SVDB  946 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=946
>
>SVDB  949 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=949
>
>SVDB  952 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=952
>
>SVDB  961 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=961
>
>SVDB  962 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=962
>
>SVDB  984 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=984
>
>SVDB 1092 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1092
>
>SVDB 1138 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1138
>
>SVDB 1159 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1159
>
>SVDB 1253 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1253
>
>SVDB 1255 ___Yes   _X_No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1255

Sounds like we still have Shalom's concerns to iron out, and some
remaining references to UDP terminals as "ports".

>SVDB 1260 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1260
>
>SVDB 1261 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1261
>
>SVDB 1297 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1297

Assuming that the proposal is to close it as already resolved.

>SVDB 1298 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1298

As Shalom pointed out, the other item that covers this is 1004, not 1299.
However, it is covered, and we can close this item.  There is some
text at the bottom of 1298 that doesn't belong here, since it is part
of item 1299.  However, it appears in 1299 also, so no real harm seems
to have been done.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com