Stu's votes... > SVDB 871 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=871 > > SVDB 881 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=881 > > SVDB 882 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=882 > > SVDB 908 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=908 > > SVDB 911 ___Yes _X__No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=911 Will change to YES with Cliff's proposed friendly ammendment to the wording. > > SVDB 912 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=912 > > SVDB 919 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=919 > > SVDB 932 __X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=932 > > SVDB 941 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=941 > > SVDB 942 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=942 > > SVDB 944 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=944 > > SVDB 945 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=945 > > SVDB 946 ___Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=946 > > SVDB 949 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=949 Would like to also inlcude Cliff's friendly ammendment to fix line wrap problem. > > SVDB 952 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=952 > > SVDB 961 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=961 > > SVDB 962 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=962 It would be helpful if the .htm file for the proposal showed a strike-through of the old wording. > > SVDB 984 _X__Yes ___No _X_ Abstain > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=984 The proposal sounds reasonable, but I would want to hear from someone who is an expert on specify blocks to be sure the change is appropriate. > > SVDB 1092 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1092 > > SVDB 1138 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1138 > > SVDB 1159 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1159 > > SVDB 1253 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1253 > > SVDB 1255 ___Yes _X__No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1255 There is no specific proposal for editing changes. But I agree that all UDP I/O should be called "terminals", not "ports". The the VPI (and deprecated ACC) use "terminal" to distinguish UDP I/O from module ports. > > SVDB 1260 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1260 > > SVDB 1261 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1261 > > SVDB 1297 ___Yes _X__No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1297 I did not see a specific proposal for editing changes. > > SVDB 1298 ___Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1298 I did not see a specific proposal for editing changes. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stuart Sutherland stuart@sutherland-hdl.com +1-503-692-0898Received on Mon Feb 6 08:01:04 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 06 2006 - 08:03:09 PST