Bresticker, Shalom wrote: > I assume you're referring only to functions. Definitely -- that was the context of the discussion; I should have made that clean in the paragraph you quoted. Gord. > Shalom > > > >>At this point, I think that both the utility of fork-join_none >>or even fork-join_any is questionable (I don't like fork-join >>in functions for that reason as well) and since it is likely >>to cause confusion in the user base, I'd really prefer to just >>make it illegal. >> >>Does anyone have a compelling use model for allowing this? >> >>Gord. > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.comReceived on Fri Feb 17 06:43:41 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 17 2006 - 06:44:25 PST