[sv-bc] Response to the P1800 on the subject of merging the LRMs

I received (and corrected) very minor changes to the posted minutes of
the 
February 6, 2006 meeting:

http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/minutes/sv-bc_06_02_06.txt

These changes were related to my capture of comments and not with the 
approved wording of the official response.

Therefore, the SV-BC's response to the P1800's question of pursuing 
the merge of the 1364 & 1800 LRMs is as follows:

(NOTE: All eligible voters approved with exceptions noted below)

1) The SV-BC committee supports the merge of P1800 & 1364 standards if a
first draft is completed by an editor and the commitee has at least 1
year 
before the cut-off date for changes to the next revision of the standard
to 
review it.

Opposed: Karen  - Poor use of Karen's time and does not benefit her
users
         Brad   - Poor use of Brad's time and does not benefit his users
Abstain: Shalom - Not a good use of committee's time

2) The SV-BC requests that the next revision of the LRM be completed, 
balloted and approved by the end of 2008.

Abstain: Mark   - Prefers scope of work determine deadline, not deadline
                  determine scope of work.
         Logie  - would prefer to define goal before setting deadline


3) SV-BC requests an editor throughout the process, would like a updated

draft LRM with changes applied every 6 months and a mechanism for
regularly 
communicating proposed changes to the public every 6 months.



Matt
--
Matt Maidment
mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com