Re: [sv-bc] default task/function argument type

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Mon Feb 20 2006 - 11:48:04 PST

>From: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>

>I agree.

Thanks for the sanity check.  Unfortunately, the LRM seems to say
otherwise.  I have filed erratum 1340 on this.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com

Received on Mon Feb 20 11:48:13 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Steven Sharp: "RE: [sv-ec] RE: [sv-bc] Can a function contain a fork/join/any/none?"
Previous message: Brad Pierce: "Re: [sv-bc] Mantis 1345: 10.4: "illegal" unique if/case issues"
Maybe in reply to: Steven Sharp: "[sv-bc] default task/function argument type"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 20 2006 - 11:50:04 PST