RE: [sv-bc] Suggested items for email vote

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Thu Mar 09 2006 - 00:42:03 PST
998: I agree. In SV, there is no question, though there was a question
in Verilog.

 

99: Yes and no. If you had an entire document of high English quality
and one specific chapter with a lot of bad spelling and grammar, then it
would make sense to file a specific issue on that particular chapter.
That is roughly the case here. In the issue description, I mentioned the
following specific problems: inconsistent and misspellings and incorrect
entries (such as reference to $displayf), duplicate entries due to
letter case ("QQ" and "qq" become separate index entries) or different
wording. I fixed a lot of those in 1364-2001 Version C, but I was not
able to copy those corrections to 1364-2005. In a merged document, those
sections of text which are simply copied to the new document from
1364-2005 are going to have the same problems. There is also another
difference between the index and the text body. The technical
sub-committees do indeed review the text body, they don't normally
review the index, which is a problem, and requires a special reminder.

 

Shalom

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Rich, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:47 PM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Suggested items for email vote

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 4:05 AM
To: Rich, Dave; sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Suggested items for email vote

 

998: What is the proposal?

[DR>] The issue is a question which I answered as a bugnote.

999: I propose to postpone the issue on the basis that it should wait
until after LRM merge.

[DR>] I guess we will have to vote on this at a meeting. Unless you have
specific problems that need proposals, this is just an action item. It
no different than saying we need to review Clause 1, Clause 2 after they
have been edited.

1002: I need to look at this. At one time, I had started working on a
proposal which was a more significant rewording.

1005: I need to look at this.

1323: No opinion.

 

Shalom

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Rich, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 9:20 AM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] Suggested items for email vote

 

I propose to take the following items to an e-mail vote. To streamline
the process, I think it would be a good idea to discuss these items
before actually beginning the e-mail vote to see if anyone has
objections.

 

 

 

 

  <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_update_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0000998> 

 

0000998 <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000998>  

1
<http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000998&nbn=1#bugnotes
>  

V-1364 

trivial 

assigned (bpierce) 

12-21-05 

 10.2.2, 10.3.1: 'reg' keyword in tf port declarations 

 

 

 <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_update_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0000999> 



0000999 <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000999>  

2
<http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000999&nbn=2#bugnotes
>  

V-1364 

text 

assigned (shalom) 

01-02-06 

check index 

 

 

 <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_update_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001002> 



0001002 <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001002>  

1
<http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001002&nbn=1#bugnotes
>  

V-1364 

text 

assigned (daver) 

12-21-05 

9.2: assignment variable_lvalue evaluation order question 

 

 

 <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_update_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001005> 



0001005 <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001005>  

2
<http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001005&nbn=2#bugnotes
>  

V-1364 

feature 

assigned (daver) 

12-23-05 

4.2.1: Vector bit-select and part-select addressing 

 

 

  <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_update_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001323> 



0001323 <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001323>  

  

SV-BC 

tweak 

assigned (daver) 

02-04-06 

Clarifications needed for imported identifier access

 

 

David Rich
Verification Technologist
Design Verification & Test Division
Mentor Graphics Corporation
dave_rich@mentor.com
Office:   408 487-7206
Cell:     510 589-2625

 



image001.gif
image002.gif
image003.gif
Received on Thu Mar 9 00:45:03 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 09 2006 - 00:45:43 PST