OK, but "The LRM only says they can be used in macro text." as opposed to "The LRM says they can only be used in macro text." It does not explicitly say they cannot be used in actual arguments. I don't have an opinion yet about whether it would be useful. I do think it needs to be explicit. > >> I don't think so. The LRM only says they can be used in > macro > >> text. > > > >[Shalom] True. But when I substitute the arguments, they > become part of > >the text. It should be stated explicitly. > > I disagree with your interpretation of the terminology. The > term > "macro text" is always used to mean the text in the macro > definition. > Substituting the actual arguments does not make them part of > the macro > text. The formal arguments are part of the macro text. The > actual > arguments become part of the expansion of the macro, not part > of the > macro text. > > You may not like the terminology, but I think it is clear. Thanks, ShalomReceived on Tue Mar 21 00:58:10 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 21 2006 - 00:58:19 PST