RE: [sv-bc] Question on compilation units & compiler directives

I filed this as Mantis 1400.

 

Shalom

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Arturo Salz
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 11:48 PM
To: Steven Sharp; Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com; sv-bc@eda.org; Bresticker,
Shalom; doug_warmke@mentor.com
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Question on compilation units & compiler directives

 

Steven Sharp's comments seem very sensible.

I believe the only issue at hand is whether the LRM should prescribe a
use-mode 

default behavior or not. Steven seems to argue that it should not, thus,
requiring 

the removal of the sentence:

 

The default definition of a compilation unit is defined in case b above,
in which 

each file is a separate compilation unit.

 

I can envision this as a tool specific issue, and agree that we remove
the paragraph.

 

            Arturo